Thank you for taking time out of your busy schedule to participate in this debate competition. I believe our debaters will surely have a wonderful performance. In the past, people were on different sides of the earth, but now people can meet with a network of thousands of miles. In the past, even small countries and few people, people also do not contact each other. Today, people can get married in a net. So is the effect of the Internet on today's college students more positive or negative than positive? Both sides are right and both sides are right.er-argument:ng people.ace to face?e?her.
Both parties state their case
State the reason
In the 21st century, the rapid development of the Internet has provided more convenience to our life: it enables us to contact frequently even though we are thousands of miles apart. This efficient way of contact improves our pace of life and quality of life. Today, we mainly demonstrate two points: First, the emergence of the Internet makes it easy for people to communicate and exchange ideas. We can communicate with distant relatives and friends through network video, so that family and friends can avoid the torture of missing, closer feelings, increase friendship, how can the opposite side say that the Internet makes people more distant? Now if you lost a relative or friend, we can search online, post to find, find that feeling, this is not to let people closer to each other and performance? Second, the Internet provides more communication platforms. Through the Internet, we can communicate with strangers more information, we can share the rich information resources of foreign countries, and communicate with people who share the same interests. How can it be said that it is more distant? If it were not for the Internet, we might not know the Indonesian tsunami and the Japanese earthquake so quickly. People all over the world carry forward the spirit of mutual help and friendship through the Internet, show each other care, and let them feel the warmth of humanity. Isn't this closer? Through the power of the Internet, we appeal to the masses to save the critically ill people, which is not closer to the feelings between people? We look back and see that the Internet has brought people closer togetState the reason
First of all, we affirm that the Internet brings more convenient information resources to people. What the defender has stated to us is nothing more than to show the rapidity and convenience of information exchange on the Internet. However, the study of interpersonal relations tells us that people's communication mainly falls into two categories: emotional exchange and information exchange. At present, most of the communication on the network is information exchange, but we all know that the so-called close and distant problem, mainly refers to the interpersonal relationship and thought and feelings of affinity, and we face the network in the face of the computer and how to produce feelings? Internet is just a tool invented by human beings. It does provide convenience for human beings to communicate at a distance. However, the closeness of distance does not mean the closeness of inner feelings. Marxist theory teaches us that we should look beyond the appearance to the essence. I believe we have all heard that a series of tragic incidents occurred when netizens met each other. How can this kind of irrational meeting be better than the friends made in real life? And from the point of view of the network problems, today's network has not formed a set of mature network ethics and network regulations to restrict and regulate it, many people wear a mask online, and the information and materials you face may be false, now more people addicted to the network, man-machine communication, but ignore the direct face-to-face communication in real life, How can the virtuality and falsity of the Internet make us feel closChallenge and debate:
Opposing side 1, 2, 3 Questions to pro side 1, 3:
The opposing side: May I ask the positive side, what is the difference between the virtual space communication and the flowers in the water moon mirror?
Pro side: our point of view is that the network makes people closer, the virtual nature of the network makes us less scruples and troubles. The virtual nature of the network is just a platform, and the virtual name does not represent the real emotion in the heart. The virtual nature of the network makes us less scruples and troubles, so that we can get closer in the process of communication.
The opposing side: May I ask the pro side, interpersonal communication depends on sincerity and trust, where to look in the random false network?
Pro side: The other side of the debate on this issue made a fundamental mistake, that is, do not look at the overall, only look at one side. I see a lot of people on the Internet are exchanging their learning and life experiences, so that people can communicate with each other online. Whether this is a sign of closeness or estrangement, we should not generalize.
Opposing side: Pro side, are people closer to each other on the Internet than fPro: We communicate with our friends through the Internet, and in the process of conversation, we communicate in a heart-to-heart way. Isn't this kind of communication closer, then what kind of communication can be considered closer? And for introverted people, it may be a little shy to express their feelings in person, so doesn't the Internet provide us with a good opportunity? Can the other side say that as for face-to-face communication, there is no false element? Does the other party think that there is a false element in such communication through the Internet?
One, two, three questions to the opposition:
Pro: In order to be more advanced in communication, it must be done by face-to-face communication?
The other side: Of course, to bring people closer together, of course, we should have face-to-face communication based on honesty and trust. Without honesty and trust, how can we have such a basis for communication? The communication between people should pay attention to a "letter". How to build this trust is through time and body language.
D: May I ask, through the Internet, people help the critically ill and support the Hope Project. How does such support alienate people?
The con: We're not saying that support is alienating, but let's look at more. We know that more and more people chat online, but the divorce rate of Chinese couples is higher and higher, pay attention to the network close will inevitably make people farther and farther away from reality. According to a survey, teenagers addicted to the Internet have no ability to communicate with others in real life, so it seems that the Internet is more alienatiPro: May I ask, is it more convenient for people to denounce the strong US policy and support the affected refugees through the Internet, such a show of cross-border concern?
Such cross-border caring, of course, brings people closer together. But the other side argued that we are blind and cannot see Mount Tai. According to the survey, in the United States there are 3/4 people do not know their neighbors, friends, even their own neighbors do not know, you have to go to the virtual space to find the so-called network friends?
Moderator: Let's move on to a free debate
Summary of pros and cons:
I'm going to make three arguments for our position. First, the emergence of the Internet allows people to break down borders, break down cultural barriers. We know that the Internet is everywhere, whether you are in Asia and Europe, you can go through the Asian link, you can go through the European Union to communicate with people. Is this breaking down borders closer or more distant? Second, the Internet has successfully aroused the hearts of people to help and care for each other. The massacre of overseas Chinese in Indonesia and the bombing of Kosovo in Yugoslavia have received overwhelming support on the Internet, which is an irrefutable example. Thirdly, the Internet has successfully broken the time barrier. Today, no matter you are far away or on the other side of the earth, I can communicate with you instantaneously through the Internet. From lack of communication in the past to frequent communication through the Internet, if this relationship is not called closer, is it called more distant as the other side of the debate friend said? Thanks!
The countThe counter-argument:
We believe that the Internet alienates people for three reasons. First, the progress of technological means does not necessarily lead to the progress of human spiritual civilization, because of its public opinion, seek their share. Common values and common times can mold common ideals and pursuits. When the Internet and tall buildings bring people closer together, why do we feel so much more lonely and confused? Second, rely on network communication, ignore interpersonal communication. It attempts to replace the emotional communication between people in real life with man-machine communication, which makes people more distant. What makes a man human is his ability to make and use tools without indulging in them, his ability to make and abide by a social contract, to punish evil and to promote good. When people in the isolated electronic castle, through the keyboard to even a few miles away relatives and friends send a string of no heat and no life of the electronic information, ask, human has lost only "friends come from afar, isn't it happy" the nature of real communication? Third, human's own problems can only be solved by people themselves. The improvement of the relationship between people and people ultimately comes from the improvement of the communication between people and people in real life. Even if we can't choose the era we live in, we can arbitrarily change an era and finally create a new era.